.: Employment Law - Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal
The case of Thornley v Land Securities Trillium Ltd [2005] concerned a claim for unfair and constructive dismissal by an employee who alleged that her employer imposed a new job description on her and she contended that her contract of employment was fundamentally breached by such changes to her duties imposed by her employer. The Tribunal upheld this claim.
The employee was originally employed by the BBC as an architect in its construction management department. On or around 12 November 2001, a substantial part of the construction department was transferred to the appellant employer, Thornley, under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1982.
Following this transfer, the employer announced its plans to restructure the department. This meant that the employee's role would have changed to that of a managerial role from the hands-on architectural work she had previously done. On or around 1 October 2002, the employee attended a meeting where she indicated that she believed her position was being made redundant. She wrote to the employer stating that as a result of the proposed restructuring, her professional expertise was being dissipated and she was becoming de-skilled as an architect. She also stated that her position was being made redundant. On or around 8 December, she again wrote to her employer raising a grievance in respect of the new role, which she claimed was not comparable with the job specification of the role she had when she was transferred to the employer.
She brought a grievance hearing and following this hearing on 28 January 2003, the employee was informed that her position was not redundant. On 13 February, she resigned on the grounds of constructive dismissal. The employee then made an employment tribunal claim where she claimed constructive dismissal. The tribunal found that the effective cause of the employee's resignation had been the imposition of the new job description, which fundamentally breached the terms of her contract, with the result that the employee was entitled to resign and to be treated as having been dismissed. The tribunal therefore upheld her claim. The employer appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).
The employer in its appeal contended that the tribunal had misconstrued the employee's contract of employment:
The tribunal's decision was perverse;
The issues for the determination by the EAT were whether the tribunal had erred in arriving at its conclusion with regard to:
the extent of the employee's duties under her contract;
the extent to which those duties were to be changed;
whether the employer had been entitled to change her duties; and
if not, whether the employer's breach of contract was a fundamental breach entitling her to resign.
The EAT dismissed the appeal and held that in the circumstances:
the tribunal was entitled to conclude that the changes to the employee's duties under her contract of employment were a fundamental breach of her contract;
the tribunal did not err in its construction of the employee's contract or in concluding that by the changes proposed to her duties, the employer had intended not to be bound by her contract;
the tribunal's decision that the employee was entitled to resign on the basis of constructive dismissal was correct;
no error could be detected in the way in which the tribunal identified the employee's express duties under her contract of employment;
the tribunal's conclusions on the evidence that there were significant changes to her duties, which would have had the effect of deskilling her as an architect, were unimpeachable; and
the employee's contract, read as a whole, did not permit the employer to change the employee's duties to the extent and nature it had proposed.
If you require further information contact us.
Email: enquiries@rtcoopers.com
© RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.
Article keywords: Solicitors in London, Employment Lawyers, Employment Solicitors, unfair dismissal, discrimination, employment solicitors, find employment lawyer, employment law advice, employment law firm, employment
Article Source: http://www.articles32.com
RT Coopers Solicitors, solicitors, solicitor, EMPLOYMENT LAWYER, redundancy, redundancy law, legal advice, law, legal, lawyers, LAWYER, employment law, employment lawyers, employment law advice, employment solicitors, employment tribunal, employers, employees, Sex Discrimination, Discrimination Claims, Unfavourable treatment, race discrimination, racial discrimination, Unfair Dismissals, law firm, FIRM, Sex discrimination, data protection, Sexual harassment, maternity rights, Maternity and Paternity Disputes, Outsourcing Contracts, Senior Executive Appointments and Service Agreements, Suspensions, Tribunal Claims, bringing a claim to the employment tribunal, TUPE Transfers, Redundancy, Breach of Contract Disputes, Employment Contracts, Staff Handbooks, Wrongful dismissals, Contract Drafting, Contract Dispute, Equal Pay, Right to Equal pay, contracts, Contract Disputes. lease contact us for more information: enquiries@rtcoopers.com or visit our website at www.rtcoopers.com/practice_employment.php
.: New Legal Articles
1). Who Can Make An Accessibility Claim Under the ADA
Who Can Make a claim under the ADA for lack of accessibility to a public business or facility.
2). A Loophole in Landlord Tenant Law in California
Basic housing standards required for residential property and a the loop hole that allows landlords to legally harass tenants.
3). Asbestos Settlements Help Victims Breathe Easier
The term asbestos settlement is used to describe all legal settlements reached where asbestos exposure has caused serious medical problems for an individual who worked in an environment now known to cause several types of 100% fatal cancers.
4). Choosing the Right Mesothelioma Lawyer Means Everything
Recently, have you or a loved one been diagnosed with Mesothelioma?
5). Mesothelioma And Getting Legal Representation
Filing a Mesothelioma lawsuit can be a long and arduous road.
6). Mesothelioma Lawyers In High Demand
Mesothelioma is a rare, deadly cancer that strikes nearly 3,000 people in the United States every year.
7). What Constitutes Nursing Home Neglect - Help for Nursing Home Abuse Victims
In America today, we have placed nearly 2 million elderly family members under the direct care of a nursing home.
.: Top Legal Articles
1). What does it take to be a Lawyer?
When you see all these handsome Lawyers in TV series like LA Law, sitting in their fancy offices, driving these flashy cars, have you ever realized what they have been through in terms of time, years of education, money, Certifications etc’.
Let me Describe to you the Lawyers course of training. Formal educational requirements for lawyers include a 4-year college degree, 3 years in law school, and the passing of a written bar examination.
2). Crime Never Pays
Crime is a bad thing. And the previous sentence was an understatement, and an inaccurate description of the concept of Crime.
3). The New Bankruptcy “Means Test” Explained in Plain English
With the new bankruptcy law in effect as of October 17, 2005, there is a lot of confusion regarding the new "means test" requirement. The means test will be used by the courts to determine eligibility for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The purpose of this article is to explain in plain language how the means test works, so that consumers can get a better idea of how they will be affected under the new rules.
4). Estate Planning - No Contest Clause in your Will
Copyright 2006 Ronald Hudkins
There is value in the story of an older client who had seen a very interesting clause employed in a will. There was a great deal of money at stake and the many family members had little reason to love each other, because they had never met and never knew of each other’s existence. It was expected that the will would be heavily contested on several different fronts in every conceivable way.
5). DUI Law Punishments
It’s no surprise that current DUI Law mandates that DUI punishments cause problems in your personal life in the short term. With punishments such as t
6). Employment Law - Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal
The case of Thornley v Land Securities Trillium Ltd [2005] concerned a claim for unfair and constructive dismissal by an employee who alleged that her employer imposed a new job description on her and she contended that her contract of employment was fundamentally breached by such changes to her duties imposed by her employer. The Tribunal upheld this claim.
7). Employment Law - Excessive Working Hours - Breach of Duty of Care
n the case of Mark Hone v Six Continents Retail Limited (2005), a pub landlord having collapsed due to overwork successfully sued his former employers in the County Court for breach of duty of care.
Mr Hone, the claimant, started working for Bass (now Six Continents) as a pub manager in 1995 and in 1998 was awarded "Pub Manager of the Year". However, in 1999 he started working at The Old Moat House where he found himself working 13 hour days.