.: Employment Law: Unfair Dismissal - Employer Succeeded in Changing Terms of Employment
Good News for Employers wishing to change the terms of employment of employees, however, employers must still take care.
In Scott & Co v Richardson [2005], the Dependant, Mr Richardson, who worked for a Scottish firm of debt collectors, refused to accept his new terms of employment which required him to visit defaulting debtors during the evenings. Mr Richardson agreed to work evenings but only if this would continue to attract overtime payments as had previously been the case. Scott & Co tried for seven months to persuade Mr Richardson to change his mind but he refused, finally issuing an ultimatum that his employer should either accept his position or dismiss him. They chose to dismiss him.
At first instance, Scott & Co claimed that the change in working conditions was required to bring the company into line with new market practices and to allow them to plan work more cheaply and effectively. Mr Richardson argued that Scott & Co had failed to prove that there were advantages to the new working arrangements and that the real reason for the changes was to save money in overtime payments.
Mr Richardson succeeded in his claim for unfair dismissal and the Employment Tribunal held that it did not appear that the imposition of the shift system was of such discernible advantage that the only reasonable thing to do was to terminate the employee's contract unless he would agree to the new arrangement.
On appeal the EAT overturned this decision and held that:-
A Tribunal should not 'second guess' an employer's business decision;
A Tribunal should evaluate whether dismissal was due to the employer's reasonable belief that the contract changes had advantages; and
The employer did not need to prove that those advantages objectively exist.
This is good news for employers who can rely on the principle that the tribunal must respect their commercial decisions in assessing whether a fair reason for dismissal has been shown. However this must be tempered by another EAT decision in Forshaw and others v Archcraft Limited [2005], where the EAT relied on its own assessment that the clause in question was unreasonable and found that the dismissal was unfair. In Forshaw the EAT said that while the tribunal generally will not re-open the commercial decisions of an employer's management, however, a reason which is genuinely held but is trivial or unworthy or whimsical will mean that the dismissal is unfair.
Comment: Provided that care is taken, changes to employment terms which are supported by sound commercial reasons will be acceptable under the law.
If you require further information contact us.
Email: enquiries@rtcoopers.com
© RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.
Article keywords: Solicitors in London, Employment Lawyers, Employment Solicitors, unfair dismissal, discrimination, find a law firm advise unfair dismissal, suspension, bullyied, bullying, harrassment
Article Source: http://www.articles32.com
RT Coopers Solicitors, solicitors, solicitor, EMPLOYMENT LAWYER, redundancy, redundancy law, legal advice, law, legal, lawyers, LAWYER, employment law, employment lawyers, employment law advice, employment solicitors, employment tribunal, employers, employees, Sex Discrimination, Discrimination Claims, Unfavourable treatment, race discrimination, racial discrimination, Unfair Dismissals, law firm, FIRM, Sex discrimination, data protection, Sexual harassment, maternity rights, Maternity and Paternity Disputes, Outsourcing Contracts, Senior Executive Appointments and Service Agreements, Suspensions, Tribunal Claims, bringing a claim to the employment tribunal, TUPE Transfers, Redundancy, Breach of Contract Disputes, Employment Contracts, Staff Handbooks, Wrongful dismissals, Contract Drafting, Contract Dispute, Equal Pay, Right to Equal pay, contracts, Contract Disputes. lease contact us for more information: enquiries@rtcoopers.com or visit our website at www.rtcoopers.com/practice_employment.php
.: New Legal Articles
1). Who Can Make An Accessibility Claim Under the ADA
Who Can Make a claim under the ADA for lack of accessibility to a public business or facility.
2). A Loophole in Landlord Tenant Law in California
Basic housing standards required for residential property and a the loop hole that allows landlords to legally harass tenants.
3). Asbestos Settlements Help Victims Breathe Easier
The term asbestos settlement is used to describe all legal settlements reached where asbestos exposure has caused serious medical problems for an individual who worked in an environment now known to cause several types of 100% fatal cancers.
4). Choosing the Right Mesothelioma Lawyer Means Everything
Recently, have you or a loved one been diagnosed with Mesothelioma?
5). Mesothelioma And Getting Legal Representation
Filing a Mesothelioma lawsuit can be a long and arduous road.
6). Mesothelioma Lawyers In High Demand
Mesothelioma is a rare, deadly cancer that strikes nearly 3,000 people in the United States every year.
7). What Constitutes Nursing Home Neglect - Help for Nursing Home Abuse Victims
In America today, we have placed nearly 2 million elderly family members under the direct care of a nursing home.
.: Top Legal Articles
1). What does it take to be a Lawyer?
When you see all these handsome Lawyers in TV series like LA Law, sitting in their fancy offices, driving these flashy cars, have you ever realized what they have been through in terms of time, years of education, money, Certifications etc’.
Let me Describe to you the Lawyers course of training. Formal educational requirements for lawyers include a 4-year college degree, 3 years in law school, and the passing of a written bar examination.
2). Crime Never Pays
Crime is a bad thing. And the previous sentence was an understatement, and an inaccurate description of the concept of Crime.
3). The New Bankruptcy “Means Test” Explained in Plain English
With the new bankruptcy law in effect as of October 17, 2005, there is a lot of confusion regarding the new "means test" requirement. The means test will be used by the courts to determine eligibility for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The purpose of this article is to explain in plain language how the means test works, so that consumers can get a better idea of how they will be affected under the new rules.
4). Estate Planning - No Contest Clause in your Will
Copyright 2006 Ronald Hudkins
There is value in the story of an older client who had seen a very interesting clause employed in a will. There was a great deal of money at stake and the many family members had little reason to love each other, because they had never met and never knew of each other’s existence. It was expected that the will would be heavily contested on several different fronts in every conceivable way.
5). DUI Law Punishments
It’s no surprise that current DUI Law mandates that DUI punishments cause problems in your personal life in the short term. With punishments such as t
6). Employment Law - Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal
The case of Thornley v Land Securities Trillium Ltd [2005] concerned a claim for unfair and constructive dismissal by an employee who alleged that her employer imposed a new job description on her and she contended that her contract of employment was fundamentally breached by such changes to her duties imposed by her employer. The Tribunal upheld this claim.
7). Employment Law - Excessive Working Hours - Breach of Duty of Care
n the case of Mark Hone v Six Continents Retail Limited (2005), a pub landlord having collapsed due to overwork successfully sued his former employers in the County Court for breach of duty of care.
Mr Hone, the claimant, started working for Bass (now Six Continents) as a pub manager in 1995 and in 1998 was awarded "Pub Manager of the Year". However, in 1999 he started working at The Old Moat House where he found himself working 13 hour days.